Forums Bindings New HB binding, suggest a name? Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)Author Posts December 14, 2014 at 10:22 pm #725308 lictor4 63 PostsHere we go another off the wall binding proto type…. My last go around here was a plate-style binding focused on removing as much weight as possible during climbing with Phantom-level security and board rigidity. I am very happy with the result 😀This new concept is clearly for deep pow days where surfing is the goal, having a tight board connection but plenty of “forgiveness” between boot and board. The idea started with the goal of overall weight savings: using the boots rigidity as the main stiffener between board halves. I’m concerned about the small contact points damaging my boots so I will be making larger “pads”on the sides. Apart from that (and my rushed hacksaw skills) i like what I have so far. The boot has lots of medial freedom while the boards stay reasonably firm when moving from toe to heel (at least on the carpet).Now to finish the other one and wait for the snow to fly! December 15, 2014 at 5:57 pm #735800 powslash 382 PostsMan, No idea if those will work… but keep it up! I really enjoy seeing what you come up with. Thanks for posting. December 25, 2014 at 12:52 am #774647 Taylor 796 PostsThis seems like the basic ingredients to another clever and elegant design.Am I correct in seeing that the binding plates remained fastened to the board during tour mode, while the cable goes in one’s pack? They basically function like large hooks with boot cradles and cable routing?Eager to see next iterations.@sun_rocket December 25, 2014 at 2:20 am #774691 maniacdave 564 PostsHoly shit, I know what I’m cooking up once I get back home to the garage in January. That is fkna brilliant!Thong? Nudes? Boot bikini? Love it mang!That was Pontus December 26, 2014 at 1:41 am #775192 lictor4 63 PostsYep, the plates stay on the board and I really like the idea of trading off the cable with my skins, which are often in my jacket pocket. (No more taking my pack off when doing quick laps) January 17, 2015 at 2:51 pm #778441 b0ardski 251 PostsI want a better look at that DIYnafit toe. What did you use for pins? Also, where the cables go through the cut aluminum looks like a serious wear point. October 18, 2015 at 7:54 pm #784520 Aaron_C 8 PostsThese look fantastic. Any updates? Did they hold up? October 18, 2015 at 10:18 pm #784524 lictor4 63 PostsI didn’t get them to the point of being ride worth last season. Guess it’s time to get back to work… For the DYInafits I used a bolt that was ground down for the pins October 19, 2015 at 11:40 am #784540 HansGLudwig 601 PostsHoly cow! I was so enamored by the cleverness of the binding, I didn’t even notice your DIYnafits (or that the name was clever). Well done…on so many levels.If your clamp-style cable attachment isn’t tight enough, perhaps you can employ something with this kind of technology to take up slack (which I assume will creep in after the cable has stretched). Be sure to bookmark Splitboard.com's Recent Activity page... http://splitboard.com/activity-2/ October 26, 2015 at 11:47 am #784902 Scooby2 623 PostsCould the cable go through two rigid pins or be attached to two rigid pins where the cable crosses the board halves. The rigid portion of the cables go under a ledge or hooks that would prevent bending between the board halves.another thought, look at a Plum WOM hook, it creates a lot more rigidity than voile hooks after a few degrees of movement. they have two overlapping surfaces instead of using the board deck as a surface. A similar theory might reduce the wiggle amount in your binding design a lot.You could just epoxy down some lightweight wood blocks for the toe and heel to rest on outside of the bindings instead of riding on the edge of the aluminum. with a block made of poplar, it’s be easy to just belt sand it down gradually to just the right thickness, then contact cement a little foam or rubber on top for a damp connection.keep us posted December 18, 2015 at 10:05 am #787300 Scooby2 623 PostsAmsteel blue or similar dyneema cord could be a great replacement for the steel cable. maybe an anchor point could be movable to adjust for tightness rather than adjusting a dyneema cord. Or the weight savings would allow for a small turnbuckle like Hans posted. December 18, 2015 at 12:55 pm #787303 Guy Gaston 21 Postslictor4 wrote:I didn’t get them to the point of being ride worth last season. Guess it’s time to get back to work… For the DYInafits I used a bolt that was ground down for the pinsSuper inspiring work! May I ask about how the yellow handle on the tech-toe works? Building some carbon fiber tech toes at the moment, and I’m trying to figure out some kind of locking / snap device for the pins. December 19, 2015 at 11:06 am #787325 lictor4 63 PostsYa the turn buckle idea us definitely a good one. I guess I slowed down on this cause it was getting too bulky, I envisioned a much more minimalistic outcome when I started so I’m kinda going back to the drawing board. The DIYna toes started here I still really like this idea, the vid isn’t super clear cause the toe piece isn’t bolted down but the concept is to rotate the boot into the pins and a swing arm locks upright to secure the boot. The yellow thing in the pic was just a different approach to locking the swing arm(in the vid, the lock is a heavy wire that springs like a benner gate but I couldn’t get it to retain its springy-ness) Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)You must be logged in to reply to this topic.