Skip to main content

Home Forums Splitboard Talk Forum 2012-2013 spark deeluxe xv boot.

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 33 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #576187
    christoph benells
    Participant

    is soooo soooo sick.

    has the heel welt.

    improved waterproofing.

    its sick.

    pics to come.

    available for pre-order from next adventure coming here shortly.

    #650411
    lernr
    Participant

    Glad they paid attention to what the riders are saying

    Cheers
    Ivo

    #650412
    shoestring
    Participant

    ditto – looking forward to seeing it!

    #650413
    HansGLudwig
    Participant

    Did you see this interview? We are referred to as “splitboard activists.”

    http://business.transworld.net/81148/uncategorized/201213-boots-preview-deeluxe/

    Be sure to bookmark Splitboard.com's Recent Activity page...
    http://splitboard.com/activity-2/

    #650415
    acopafeel
    Participant

    The more I boot pack with crampons this spring, I realize just how packed out my current boots (32 TM2) are getting- so looking at the Deeluxe Spark for next season.

    There are some pretty good deals on 2011 Spark boots out there- $250 new.
    Should I pull the trigger or wait until next season’s boot? Are the 2012 improvements worth the extra loot?

    WHAT SAY YE ?

    #650414
    nickstayner
    Participant

    Acopa, for what it’s worth, I have ridden the current Spark model exclusively this season (all splitting so it took a beating, esp. this time of year). It has held up admirably over long winter days of big vert and tons of spring trail and talus crushing (~16 miles of dirt walking for the Whitetail!).
    I haven’t noticed the waterproofing being an issue, but if Chris says it’s improved, might be worth looking in to.

    I would say that unless you have specific plans that will require the use of a rigid crampon, go for the deal on this season’s boot. The Black Diamond Contact fits my size 10.5 Sparks like a glove. Never had to readjust them, not even once (a new experience for me with snowboard boots & crampons!).

    #650416
    BGnight
    Participant

    After doing an 8k hike in my K2 T1’s yesterday I’m really really wanting a mountaineery boot for Volcanoes.
    Question is do these boots have a stiff sole??? (I’m guessing they didn’t from a friend’s report after he handled the new ones)
    The first Spark boots I handled DID NOT. If they didn’t add a stiff sole to this year’s model they basically did not improve them one iota. Having a stiff sole is what makes hiking easier for front pointing and relieving pressure off the calf. If the sole flexes in this aspect then it’s a retarded design no matter what crampon compatibility they added. (fyi my grivel G12’s I’ve had for 10 years climb as well as any welted crampon)
    I do like a flexible sole better for rock scrambling and schwacky approaches but that’s not what I want a mountaineery boot for.
    The spark boots I felt had a flexible sole and a stiff ankle which is exactly OPPOSITE of what a splitboot mountaineer would want. I’m hoping someone gets it right soon. It’s not rocket science.
    STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE
    STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE

    How fucking hard is that for a boot maker to comprehend? Jesus maybe I’ll fruitboot in the spring.

    #650417
    acopafeel
    Participant

    thx guys, 2011s it is then.

    Jesus maybe I’ll fruitboot in the spring.

    …don’t do it, man! :nononno:

    o just kidding! 😆

    #650418
    brg
    Participant

    my main complaint with the 2011-2012 spark boot is the toe is super soft. It provides not protection while kicking steps of steep hard snow, or vertical ice. Has anyone else had the same problem? I think I am going to go back to Burton Driver X’s next year.

    #650419
    imitationfunk
    Participant

    I’ve been riding the spark since early January. They’re definitely an upgrade over my Solomon boots. I will say cosmetically they look like crap. I have holes in the side where the pins have worn through. The outer layer that comes in contact with the binding strap is ripped apart. The boot is still solid they just look like crap. The toe box is the part that really annoys me. I wear the G10 wide crampons and between cinching them down tight and kicking steps the toe box is starting to fail. I’ll be interested to see this years model.

    #650420
    96avs01
    Participant

    @BGnight wrote:

    After doing an 8k hike in my K2 T1’s yesterday I’m really really wanting a mountaineery boot for Volcanoes.

    I’m hoping someone gets it right soon. It’s not rocket science.
    STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE
    STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE STIFF SOLE

    How fucking hard is that for a boot maker to comprehend? Jesus maybe I’ll fruitboot in the spring.

    Someone has figured it out, its just not cheap. Course this is just an option if you don’t fruitboot B! 😯

    165 Venture Divide/Spark Frankenburners/La Sportiva Spantiks
    163W Jones Solution/Phantom Alphas/Dynafit TLT5s
    162 Furberg

    Chris

    #650421
    BGnight
    Participant

    Yeah was looking at those but I’m guessing too much toe drag and not enough ankle so no bueno. Fitwell’s look rad but they don’t sell them here and I’m not willing to order them online overseas without trying ’em on.
    Maybe I’ll order those Sportiva thingys on bc.com or zappos if they have them due to their liberal return policies and see how they work in my binders.

    #650422
    UPGRAYEDD_2505
    Participant

    I used these boots this year and agree that the toe area is too squishy. If you crank your strap crampons too tightly you can crush your foot. Ouch.

    While the sole isn’t as stiff as an AT boot’s, it’s a lot stiffer than other soft boots that I’ve used over the last couple of years (malamutes, drivers). I did a little bit of front pointing here and there and the boots seemed OK. I think that a sole that is completely rigid takes away a lot of the board feel and shock absorption in difficult terrain and variable snow conditions.

    Another thing that I liked about the boot is that the liner is legit and properly moldable. I payed to get them molded at a good shop and went back a couple of times to tweak them and it made a big difference.

    BUT, once spring rolls around and you’re dealing with hard snow on big mountains like volcanos, etc, just getting to the top is often more challenging than the ride down. I hope that Deeluxe not only keeps making these boots better (more streamlined, better toe), but that they also make several versions of it, like maybe a softer version for winter pow and a stiffer-soled version that is more climb-oriented, moutaineer-y, and light-weight for melt/freeze in spring. It’s not like Dynafit only makes one AT boot and expects all backcountry skiers to use it regardless of the person’s size, skiing style, preferred terrain, etc. :twocents:

    #650423
    nickstayner
    Participant

    @UPGRAYEDD_2505 wrote:

    I used these boots this year and agree that the toe area is too squishy. If you crank your strap crampons too tightly you can crush your foot. Ouch.

    I definitely have never had this experience and I definitely crank ’em tight. I have a hard time seeing how this could be possible?

    @UPGRAYEDD_2505 wrote:

    I did a little bit of front pointing here and there and the boots seemed OK.

    I’ve also done quite a bit of front pointing in them (more than I would have liked as a product of this season’s conditions 😕 ) and they have done well. I think most of the time when splitboarders complain about their setup not frontpointing well, it’s more due to a lack of ice climbing experience than the fault of the equipment?

    #650424
    BGnight
    Participant

    All ice climbing boots have a stiff sole. Try vertical ice climbing in Spark boots. Unless you’re Will Gadd, it’s gonna suck balls.
    Spark/Deeluxe tried but they missed the mark pretty hard imo. I wish La Sportiva would make the boot we’re looking for. That would be sick!

    Stiff/solid toebox for kicking steps and stiff/nonflexible sole for support. These 2 elements are key.

    #650425
    nickstayner
    Participant

    @BGnight wrote:

    All ice climbing boots have a stiff sole. Try vertical ice climbing in Spark boots. Unless you’re Will Gadd, it’s gonna suck balls.

    Not trying to beat a dead horse here, but how often are you going to climb vertical ice in your snowboard boots for more than 10 or so meters at a time? It’s not like we need these things to climb WI5 or anything.

    #650426
    BGnight
    Participant

    You brought it up about the front pointing. It’s the same concept for front pointing a frozen 50 degree slope for 1000 feet. The foot needs support and a solid toe to get a bite like a plastic boot. Spark doesn’t have either.

    #650427
    nickstayner
    Participant

    About the frontpointing: I’m only trying to say that my experience frontpointing short sections of steep slope and yes, small sections of super steep and vertical ice has NOT sucked. On the contrary, I found the boots to be quite solid. I was just responding to your “try vertical ice climbing….” suggestion.

    At any rate… I feel like because it feels natural and secure, frontpointing is often reverted to as the default for many snowboarders who don’t have much ice or mountaineering experience. Using this technique or some variation of it can really save your calves, and it works on pretty much anything you’re going to ride down.

    #650428
    BGnight
    Participant

    I use a whole combo of techniques to save my calves climbing in snowboard boots. Front pointing is really the best, fastest and safest technique on steeper slopes. The other major reason a “soft” snowboard mountaineering boot needs a stiff sole and hard toe is to make it more safe and efficient climbing semi hard snow without crampons. Skiers and hardbooters get away with climbing lots of steep shit without having to deal with a crampon because their boots allow them safe purchase. Something along the lines of that La Sportiva boot would also do that. It’s funny, that super old Koflach superpipe boot is the closest thing to what we’re looking for and it’s 20 years later and only that fitwell boot is anywhere near that. I had a buddy that rocked those boots in soft bindings back in ’92. He shredded hard in those things. I’d much rather have a pair of those than Spark boots but they’re hard to find. Bcd’s combo highback/ankle strap with toe bail in those boots is an awesome idea.

    #650429
    lewmt
    Participant

    Since you’re so into bashing everyone else’s design ideas maybe you should create your own SB products that exclusively fit the parameters you want, sell them to the rest of us….so we can all bitch about how some aspect of your design sucks balls. I agree that too stiff of a sole would likely diminish ride feel probably make riding the things feel like clunky gaper boots. Small sacrifices for the overall good they provide.

    There in your neck of the woods you deal with more ice/hard snow conditions than where Nick rides. Seems much better suited to his style & conditions than yours. Since you’re such a genius on what they “should be” – create.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 33 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.