Splitboard.com Forums

The World's first exclusive splitboard discussion forums






It is currently Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:54 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 681
Location: Durango, CO
I've been reading Andrew Macleans blog a lot lately, he has had some pretty good advice on managing avalanche hazards. This deep slab instability we have is terrifying, and I am assuming I won't get into anything like I did last year this year. I also just spent a week in BC, and it is going to be a difficult transition back into avalanche infested snowpack of Colorado. In BC, we couldn't get anything for pit results to step down, where as here, its really not hard. Only the top new snow was the problem in BC, and it was almost always manageable. Not the case here in Colorado.

I liked his most recent post of going far for lame terrain. I may focus this year into travelling farther for more recon style trips for years to come. Lots of trees (in low angle), and new places. Not the most fun thing in terms of terrain riding, and after riding big terrain in BC, its going to be difficult, but I've found I get a lot of enjoyment out of finding new places to ride, even if they aren't crazy. And if I can stay safe, so be it.

http://straightchuter.com/2012/02/10-the-common-cure/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:02 pm
Posts: 739
Location: St. Croix Falls, WI
mellow terrain can be just as fun Bushy...You've got a good idea..stay safe to ride another day..Besides... there's alot of milfs, loose college girls, and ba daka donk ladies that you need to take a ride on the "Bush-Train"... giggidy :thatrocks:

Image

_________________
"Out of the Indian approach to life there came a great freedom, an intense and absorbing respect for life, enriching faith in a supreme power, honesty, generosity, and brotherhood"

-Luther Standing Bear,

http://splitrippin.tumblr.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:15 pm
Posts: 2583
Location: san diego CA
Quote:
there's alot of milfs, loose college girls, and ba daka donk ladies that you need to take a ride on the "Bush-Train"... giggidy





^^^^^^
That Boy just aint right


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:12 pm
Posts: 1598
Location: Now Oaktowntastic
Jason4 wrote:
Lately, especially when touring with someone for the first time, I'll remind the group that nobody should be uncomfortable with where they are. I have a hard time balancing encouragement for adventure with supporting a decision to turn around. I not only ask that anyone who has a bad feeling say something but I make sure that everyone knows that I'll be disappointed if they don't speak up.

I love that you do this. I do it too if there are new people in the group, a big group to manage, or challenging conditions. I'll tell people look if you're not comfortable speaking up, whisper it in my ear and I'll speak up. I think it makes a big difference when everyone is feeling encouraged to speak up.

I would just add that even 2 people is equal to a group and even in that case the dynamic can be f*cked. Be wary of anyone with a 'shut up and follow' attitude.

Nice subject, TEX!

_________________
Storn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 418
Location: Cupertino, CA
I'm surprised no one has posted this yet this morning. Another tragic loss. :cry:

I know that there is some predictability that cannot be factored, but the avy rose was considerable on N-NE-NW aspects and we received heavy new loading with 5 feet of new snow. Why would someone choose to be on the exact slopes forecasted to have likely human slides? This befuddles me to no end.

Preliminary incident details here:

http://www.sierraavalanchecenter.org/node/1486

My deepest condolences to all involved and the families left behind. :(

This weekend raises another red flag with a rapidly warming high pressure coming through, so be careful out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 704
Location: The Magic City
Wow. Thanks for posting this. Reminiscent of some of the terrain I was going to hit up this weekend... always nice to get visuals.

_________________
http://mtsplitski.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 800
Location: Colorado
Not to sound like a knucklehead, but...

This is the type of avy rose we see most of the year in Colorado, sometimes worse. If it weren't for considerable we would never get out in the BC.

ImageYoursImageOurs

That being said, it seems to me that with 24-40" inches in a storm cycle the avy rose should have been upgraded or a avy warning issued for a few days.

No disrespect or callousness intended. Be safe and smart out there.

_________________
Talking about snowboarding is like dancing about architecture...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:44 pm
Posts: 418
Location: Cupertino, CA
No I see your point Pedro, that rose is today's which was an improvement from yesterday which is more like the CO one.

But it had also "just" been downgraded from High and there was an avy warning that was also "just" dropped, so I would have hardly considered N-facing slopes ready to go - too many red flags.

I mean no disrespect for those involved, and maybe its just my level of risk taking here, but I wouldn't have been out in the storm cycle unless it was a lower angle S-SW slope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 681
Location: Durango, CO
Pedro,

What is that avy rose? I've only seen this for a while...
Image
:banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 800
Location: Colorado
I know! I'm feeling you, see you in a few weeks, cross your fingers....

_________________
Talking about snowboarding is like dancing about architecture...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 681
Location: Durango, CO
Yeah, it will go down, I have hope for sure, which is why we chose the end of March. Its all douching itself right now. I'll be getting out this weekend and testing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 178
Location: Bellingham
Regarding the 'considerable' danger rating, I stumbled across this on the avalanche.ca blog: http://www.avalanche.ca/cac/bulletins/forecaster-blog. It seems to make a lot of sense--yes, we deal with considerable conditions most of the time there is new snow and the majority of our time in BC probably involves considerable rating on at least one aspect. One thing to consider is the depth of the considerable instability--is it considerable probability of 6-12 inch slabs, or, as things are currently across much of the NW, considerable danger of a deep slab releasing? Some food for thought, anyways...

_________________
www.colinwisemancreative.com
www.frqncy.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Avalanches Death and Exemption
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:09 pm
Posts: 686
Location: white room
24-40" in the Sierra is not like 24-40" in CO. At least not usually. It's very typical to find some safe BC during and right after multi-foot dumps. What's really unusual this season is persistant weak layers. I've never seen those in Tahoe this late in the season, robably never past New Years. I actually climbed out of a line inbounds at the ski area yesterday because I knew there was potential for it to go and rake me through some nasty stuff. I still don't know if I would have been where those guys were, there is plenty of other stuff with easier access that is probably a bit safer. The terrain those guys were in is mostly treed, but with some scattered open patches where slides are more likely, which is where it looks like they got caught. I'm not going to second guess them, though, as I do not know them or what their decisions were based on that day. I'm pretty sure every one of us has F-ed up and made a bad call and put themselves somewhere they shouldn't have been, and just didn't get unlucky that day.

_________________
Ridin' Dirty


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  





Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group