Splitboard.com Forums

The World's first exclusive splitboard discussion forums

It is currently Sat Nov 29, 2014 12:45 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:08 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:09 pm
Posts: 137
I spent about a week on the board.


No days were spent on hard snow. There just wasn't any. :wink:
The board is easy turning and lively, reminding me of my Temple Cummings.
I found no defects from the capping. There was some thought it would cave in the middle, but if it did, it was unnoticed.
I gave it back cuz it's a litle short for the amount of snow we have.
I like the 78ST for the deeper snow and the 95ST when it's too deep?
It'd replace the 66 if it went into production, though, as the go to for most conditons.
I'd enjoy another demo in spring or firm snow conditions.
I don't want or need a mtn gun, I'd rather ski hard snow.

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:28 am 

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:55 pm
Posts: 925
Location: socal
Good stuff.

I think a cap construction would be good to offer the public if. Not everyone likes vanilla all the time. I've previously owned 2 cap board through out my years of boarding. They both have been my only boards to split wide open. I thought one was a killer board but when it was replaced I chose a different model.
I take pretty good care of my stuff, keep all my gear in tune.

There is no argument against weght savings. There are less materials involved in the lay-up so why wouldn't it weigh less? I never conducted an experiment, I simply threw out a quick factual number.

Would it actually result in a cost savings to the customer? Or would it result in more returns to the manufacturer therefore keeping the price high at the store?

btw, I happen to know a great CNC programmer/machinist if you're interested in any tooling :wink:

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:19 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:37 pm
Posts: 1881
Location: in between
I've never had durability issues with cap boards. I like Salomon boards and have ridden Ride, Burton BMC, and Gnu cap boards with no problems or delamination on the edges or anyting. But I have had some of these boards have little splits or breaks in the edges after a couple of seasons, which could be because of the cap. I suppose a hard rock shot would blow out a cap edge before a sandwich edge though.

Why wouldn't Voile consider producing a cap board?

Dropping close to a lb. on the board is significant to me. Then if we can drop another lb. with an integrated sliderplate/binding combo, we're in business. 8)

Hey Karma - are you also known as funseeker? Trying to figure out who you are. :?

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 6:44 pm 

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:04 am
Posts: 80
whats the weight of this board?

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:37 am 

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 218
Location: ak
I'm liking that taper number.
Thanks for posting karma.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: hyzerbomber and 17 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group