Splitboard.com Forums

The World's first exclusive splitboard discussion forums






It is currently Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:34 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: What are you wacky hardbooters running for angles?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 128
Location: Slackcountry, NH
A quick survey;

Please describe your set-up and tell me what are you using for stance angles and widths?

Thanks, Spencer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 12:45 pm
Posts: 158
Location: Reno
It's different on every board...

I set my bindings so that on my front foot, the heel and toe of my boot are juuuust over the edgees of the board. Then I dial my rear foot back by 5 or 7 degrees, depending on the conditions. I also tend to tighten up my stance width and center my stance, if I expect corn or hard/wind pack.

On my solid boards, I use Bomber, Trench Digger 2s; with 3 degree cant disks both oriented to slant directly to the center of the board. Bomber is also working with me to create a pair of ultra-light bindings that are basically just the heel block and toe block mounted directly to a board. They will have cant and lift built into them, and they will fit a custom insert pattern on a superlight Donek that I'm having made.... this will be my mountaineering set-up... lighter than Dynafits!

On split boards, I use the Bomber Splitboard Bindings, and I have a pair of custom-milled cant shims that mtnrider made for me, based on the compound angle that my TD2s create... I will probably need a new pair soon, as I am getting a skinnier splitboard.

Disclosure - I'm sponsored by Bomber.... but, if I had to pay for it, I'd still use their bindings.

_________________
www.trainlikeitmatters.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Crazy??!!
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 1:43 pm
Posts: 439
Location: Western Washington
On the split, 38/30 w/Voile cant shims, 'cause I'm using a split kit. 19.5 inch stance width. I may change it after some riding to higher, but that requires some more drilling. On a F2 Breezer solid, 50/45 w/cant and heel/toe lift. Am finding out I like it better than the shallower angles I was running on it. Race stick gets really steep angles, 60/55 w/Bomber TD2's, 3 degree heal& toe lift. Will most likely shift to those bindings exclusively after this season. Split will get Bombers, too, but not Intec stepins. I do a fair amount of hiking and the pins tend to get roughed up in anything other than snow.

_________________
Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them (Frederick Douglass)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Bay Area & Tahoe, CA
There's a good article from Bomber's site HERE.

I'm just considering a split board, but on my normal boards I run 60/55 with about a 19-19.5" stance width. Most of my boards have an 18cm waist.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Los Angeles, CA
I've settled into angles of 40 front, 22 back; if I could get an extra 2-4 degrees in the front, I would do so, but so far no joy. It's good to be back in hard boots on a stiff board -- I am riding Garmont Dynamites with Mtn Plates on a Mtn Gun 161, and loving the quick response (3-4' wide S-turns!).

Now I remember why I liked my carving boards so much. Pluss the overall setup is several pounds lighter than my old PMB+Flows+4807 setup. Whee.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 19
Location: Denver
I first set up the '71 gun w/ 45/35 angles - and it was crazy different than my 'in bounds' set up of 15/0. I did an area day to see if I could get used to the steeper angles. I didn't. I got thrashed like a red-headed step child on bump runs and I was not confident ripping it up in the trees.

Some of the BC runs I do require that I make pretty quick turns (chutes, trees) - and I was not comfortable w/ the steep angles doing such - so I now have them at 18/3 and I like it a ton better as it's more similar to the 'traditional' set up. (pause here for other hard boot riders to laugh).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Technique
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 12:45 pm
Posts: 158
Location: Reno
Bodynazi,

For many people, 1 day is not enough to make the transition to steeper angles... especially, if there is nobody around to teach you the basics of this totally different technique.

before you give up the steeper angles, try some of the techniques here: http://www.bomberonline.com/articles/welcome_center.cfm
To truly get the full benefit out of your hard boots, I think you'll need to give it a shot.

On another topic:
My good buddy Jef, who has some of the smoothest style I've ever seen, and has been swearing by soft boots and low angles for years, bought a pair of AT boots and set up his Burton split with Voile Mtn. Plates... He loved it...
Bomber's sales numbers on plate, splitboard bindings have at least doubled this year.... Seems like more and more people are trying it.

And, yet another topic:
I rode in BOOOOOOOTTTTTOMLESS powder this morning... lighter and dryer than anything I've ever been in... And, I did it on a skinny (23.5cm waist) board with AT boots and plate bindings... tons of fun.

Zach

_________________
www.trainlikeitmatters.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 122
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Hey Zach,

where can a person get cant/lift shims for a Voile-specific insert pattern? Or do you have them made custom? I would love to set up my front foot canted at about 3 degrees back, to move my center of gravity a bit back and take some stress off my knees. Part of my motivation for going with the Dynamites is that they are short enough not to hurt when touring and light enough not to cancel out the benefits of going with the Plates, but stiff enough laterally to drive a powder ski. I do worry about trashing my knee(s) in a panic turn with them, though, due to this lateral stiffness. Canting would help... a lot.

On a related note, has anyone with a Mtn Gun got their front binding angle up to 42-44 degrees? I'd really like to steepen up a bit, but I can't seem to make the Universal pucks do it. I would never go back to the mount-remount-remount process of a homemade split, but I'm curious how I can get a steep enough front angle for my tastes.

Even with my Nuptses I ran 40/20... with the hard boots I am now casting about for a more "neutral" feeling stance where I don't tend to over-counterrotate, and about 22 degrees seems to do it for me. I do still feel some pressure on my forward knee at 40 degrees, so I'm seeking a cant (for the joint angle, when I lean back) and some steepening (for a more neutral stance in general). I know that my rear angle is relatively shallow, but the Gun is not a carving board, and even at 22 degrees I still get maybe 1cm of toe overhang, tops, in the back.

Curious about the Dynafit toepiece mod, too... might be the only way to get a 45 degree front angle... but then where would I mount the crampons?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Technique
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:55 pm
Posts: 924
Location: socal
Zach wrote:

And, yet another topic:
I rode in BOOOOOOOTTTTTOMLESS powder this morning... lighter and dryer than anything I've ever been in... And, I did it on a skinny (23.5cm waist) board with AT boots and plate bindings... tons of fun.

Zach


oh man, I hope you blasted a turn for us workin' folk....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 6:59 pm
Posts: 43
Location: WA Backcountry
I've changed my angles back to 20 back, 30 front, after an ill-fated experiment in trying 0 back, 10 front. The last trip was much more enjoyable 8)
I was riding my resort board at a similar 25-35 angle before due to toe/heel drag, so I had some time to get used to it before I started splitboarding.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 12:45 pm
Posts: 158
Location: Reno
ttriche wrote:
Hey Zach,

where can a person get cant/lift shims for a Voile-specific insert pattern? Or do you have them made custom? I would love to set up my front foot canted at about 3 degrees back, to move my center of gravity a bit back and take some stress off my knees. Part of my motivation for going with the Dynamites is that they are short enough not to hurt when touring and light enough not to cancel out the benefits of going with the Plates, but stiff enough laterally to drive a powder ski. I do worry about trashing my knee(s) in a panic turn with them, though, due to this lateral stiffness. Canting would help... a lot.


There, unfortunately aren't any in production... What I did was to set up my TD2s (Bomber plate bindings) on top of my splitboard, without attempting to mount them to the board... just setting up angles. I then took the angles, cant degrees, and cant orientation and plugged them into a spreadsheet that you can download off of Bomber's website.

I took the resulting compound angle to a friend of mine who works in a prototyping shop, and he milled canting shims for me.... If you don't have any way of calculating as precisely as I did, you could probably figure on canting by 3 degrees, towards the center of the board, on both feet... then, adding 1 degree of lift to your front toe and 1 degree of lift to your reer heel. This is a very standard set-up and will work fine for 95% of backcountry conditions... cant and lift need to become more precise, when you're carving a lot of piste or hardpack.

Take those dimensions to a machine shop, and you should be able to explain to them what you need. It's best to just make the shims, then drill holes afterwards.

Zach

_________________
www.trainlikeitmatters.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 6:59 pm
Posts: 43
Location: WA Backcountry
I tried making my own wooden shims. Needless to say, it didn't work. :roll: Although I did see pics of someone who did this successfully. I think they had a good saw jig, and put a few coats of laquer over the drilled shims to keep the water out. Getting them machined out of plastic is a much better way to go.

I went with softer dynafit tlt boots, and the knee strain and need for shims went away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:00 pm
Posts: 19
Location: Denver
thanks for the link Zach. I can see that style making sense on groomers, but I'm still missing something @ the whole carving deal in the BC (at least anything other than casual wide open runs). Running steep couloirs where you have to make v. fast & precise turns doesn't seem condusive to v. steep angles & 'carving'. Again, obviously I'm less than a novice at it. I'll have to do another area day on groomers sometime.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  





Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group