Splitboard.com Forums

The World's first exclusive splitboard discussion forums






It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:00 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Atomic Splitboards?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:12 am
Posts: 828
Location: PNW Hood Canal
My local shop just told me they met with their Atomic Rep and thinking of me they ordered their "new" splitboards in three or four sizes. I'm honored they were thinking of me...but does anyone know of these boards? I looked at the web site with the shop's board guru. It seems they are designed with ski tips at the tail of the joined board. To skin in you turn the tails forward and use the ski tips as the forward end and the split snowboard tip as the skinning tail. They are listed to retail with a voile kit, skins and I think crampons for somewhere in the $800 range. The sizes are something like 154 164 174. I don't know the web site, but when visiting the atomicsnowboard site I found no splits. The end result of this rounded ski tips at the tail is a slight swallowtail notch. They looked pretty nifty if you are not into having a twin tip design. Any intel from those of you in the industry? Atomic make good skis, and if this price is right and they come with the kit, crampons and skins they just might be able to reach a market that some of the $1000 plus boards can't.

_________________
Mumbles...addicted thanks to sb.com
Mojo 171 / ST 178 / C-Split 165 / DIY Johan 162
Sparks Ignition II's / Mr. Chomps
DC Torch / Lowa Structura EVO AT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 211
Location: somewhere in the middle of germany
here I found this: http://www.erstespur.de/viewtopic.php?t=3742

rumours are telling the board does not come voile-equipped!

maybe we know more after the ispo at Munich/GER (worlds greatest international sports fair) end of january.

_________________
my life @ flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:12 am
Posts: 828
Location: PNW Hood Canal
The shop staff that I spoke with thought it came fully equipped, which is why I thought the price was attractive. I will post more when/if I see them in the shop and find out how much they are really letting them go for from a retail standpoint.

Anyone got any recommendations on how to convince the shop or dealer to give me one to run through the rigors? bc rider seems to get every piece of gear thrown at him...has he seen one of these atomics or know how to go about getting one?

_________________
Mumbles...addicted thanks to sb.com
Mojo 171 / ST 178 / C-Split 165 / DIY Johan 162
Sparks Ignition II's / Mr. Chomps
DC Torch / Lowa Structura EVO AT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 211
Location: somewhere in the middle of germany
Mumbles wrote:
The shop staff that I spoke with thought it came fully equipped, ...


as far as I know the board comes fully equipped - but not with voile-parts. it seems that atomic developed their own binding system ... that increases curiosity! :?

_________________
my life @ flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:53 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Posts: 4939
Location: California
Mumbles wrote:
bc rider seems to get every piece of gear thrown at him...has he seen one of these atomics or know how to go about getting one?


Skip college, sell your soul to become a pro snowboarder for a few years, get 40+ pictures published in snowboard mags, promote your sponsors, retire with an addiction to untracked snow, discover the splitboard, develop and invest in the best online resource for splitboards, and maybe you'll get a board of two a year. ;) :roll:

Re Atomic splitboards. No I haven't seen one but there are definitely some rumors out there. Time will tell....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:27 pm
Posts: 1449
Location: Denver
I've heard from a very reliable source that yes Atomic is going into the splitboard biz with their own interface. I find it interesting as how they are going to not infringe on Voile's patent. The yin yang hooks, and nose/tail clips are pretty hard to make unique imo. Then again who knows, they may have come up with something that has been under our noses the whole time.

More info on the product should hit during or right after SIA in two weeks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:49 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Posts: 4939
Location: California
Just curious, did your reliable source say it was ok for you to give specifics?

Note to self, killclimbz cant keep a secret. ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:12 am
Posts: 828
Location: PNW Hood Canal
There is no such thing as secrets. I will hit the shop's board guru on my next visit and get more details. He had a web site to look at, but I did not catch the address. I thought it would be at atomicsnowboards.com but it was not. I do know that they plan on having the snowboard tails turn around to be the skinning tips, but their interface, if it is not voile, will have to be more different than that to prevent patent infringement.

_________________
Mumbles...addicted thanks to sb.com
Mojo 171 / ST 178 / C-Split 165 / DIY Johan 162
Sparks Ignition II's / Mr. Chomps
DC Torch / Lowa Structura EVO AT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 4:10 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Posts: 4939
Location: California
Mumbles wrote:
I do know that they plan on having the snowboard tails turn around to be the skinning tips


Unless the tail height is larger than the tip height (which would be ridiculous) that doesn't sound like a very good idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 354
Location: PDX
i had an atomic solid a few years ago, it was a great board. i will probably buy another some day (after i get a few more never summers :wink: ). i would definitely be interested in a split.

_________________
JACK
"take it easy, if its easy take it twice..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 211
Location: somewhere in the middle of germany
Mumbles wrote:
I do know that they plan on having the snowboard tails turn around to be the skinning tips, ...


this confirms what user "soulrider" posted on erstespur.de. he already had the chance to test the board on snow.

- own split/hook/slider-system
- can only be used with the delivered complete binding!!!
- tail = tip in ski mode

maybe I have the chance to visit the ispo at Munich end of the month. my first way will bring me to atomic! :wink:

_________________
my life @ flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:30 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Posts: 4939
Location: California
Jogi wrote:
- own split/hook/slider-system
- can only be used with the delivered complete binding!!!
- tail = tip in ski mode


Am I the only one that is concerned how this is all going to shake down???

As much as I'm excited to see another company enter the splitboard market it also has the potential to hurt the sport if they miss the mark. Back when Burton designed their own interface the sport was young. Now the sport is older and a botched design could take us backwards.

Here are the things that concern me...

An interface that requires you use their binding. This isn't a bad thing if they totally nailed the design but otherwise if they didn't, it could backfire and render the system useless. This would mean that Atomic would lose money on their investment which could have a negative effect on the growth of the sport.

On the tail = tip thing, this also concerns me. As I stated in another post above, unless the tail height is higher than the tip height (which wouldn't make any sense) it doesn't sound like a good design. Just like on the descent, adequate tip height is critical on the ascent as well. Especially when breaking trail in deep powder. If they miss the mark again on this design philosophy, Atomic will either have a lot of angry customers of a lot of angry dealers with boards they cant sell.

I guess the other things that baffles me is how much research and consultation Atomic has done or appears to haven't done. Who were there designers and consultants? Did they consult the US and Euro market? I feel pretty confident that they've been reading our pages here but why not take it a step further and contact us to help make sure their design will succeed. Do they have the combined experience and knowledge that this site and members can provide?

Sorry to be so doom and gloom, these are just my thoughts. I wish Atomic all the best.............I just hope they don't botch it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: You may be doom and gloom, but you are right.
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:12 am
Posts: 828
Location: PNW Hood Canal
BCRider may be spouting doom and gloom, but it is rightfully so. I have no idea what the exact specs are and maybe they are good with strong R&D behind them, but if so, that will be seen. I'm new to splitting, but not to riding. If they enter the market with a focus on economy and a bunch of riders go there for the savings and get disappointed the setback is truly there. Perhaps they will then have many converting their boards to volie kits or there will be buyers stuck with the boards.

If they are reading this, they should take some of these boards and find the riders here with the best credibility and get them one to demo. A good demo can garner really good PR and a bad demo can get really readjusted R&D before going wide spread with a less than optimal product.

I have not had a chance to get any more info from my local board shop, maybe I will give him a call and see if he will give me the e-mail or web site he showed me in his office.

I'm intrigued by any new technology and opportunities, but I have been riding since '87 and I have seen many come and gone designs that did not meet the needs of knowledgable riders. Atomic is well respected in the ski industry and their solid boards get good reviews. I'm hopeful that they have some sound R&D backing and a good test market where they took prototypes to those who would put them through field testing.

More later if i can get more info. (I'm NO ONE, but if you are reading, I will DEMO one and put it through the rigors as best i can...)

_________________
Mumbles...addicted thanks to sb.com
Mojo 171 / ST 178 / C-Split 165 / DIY Johan 162
Sparks Ignition II's / Mr. Chomps
DC Torch / Lowa Structura EVO AT


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FloImSchnee and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  





Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group