Splitboard.com Forums

The World's first exclusive splitboard discussion forums






It is currently Fri Oct 24, 2014 8:56 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: NS Prospector review
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 1187
Location: Denver
Killclimbz wrote:
I did not realize Vince had posted up on the Chairman. It looks like a pretty amazing board. I am glad that Never Summer is putting some serious focus into their free ride boards. Seems like each new one is an improvement from the previous model. Looking forward to checking the Chairman out at some point in the future.


Seconded. I took my buddies solid Raptor to AK. It was a fun stick and all, but the RC profile and lack of taper had me switching back to my Storm split. I am eager to try out the new Prospector and the Chairman!

Thanks for the review, Karkis.

_________________
Phantom Bindings
Furberg Split 167
Furberg Freeride Split 164


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NS Prospector review
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:38 pm
Posts: 255
Location: powder central, bc, canuckistan
ale_capone wrote:
That's one sexy looking 3 thousand dollar set-up.


:shock:
issit??!?!!
don't tell my lady!!!
serisszly tho good point:
retail prices,
prospector, board only, $1k
phantom splitboard bindings, complete wi dyna toes $825

coltex skins $190, BD tips $20, G3 tails $20

thats round $2k... put in perspective, i paid a bit more than that for a pretty sweet xc mtn bike, used...
i like my bike but id never sleep with it.
the board is worth every penny!

_________________
never summer snowboards
phantom bindings
dynafit touring


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NS Prospector review
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:13 pm
Posts: 208
Yup, bikes are getting ridiculously expensive!

I agree with you - from personal experience, it's much easier to get the boards in the bedroom than the bikes. My wife doesn't love the boards there but will tolerate them for a while. No such luck with my bikes - totally out of the question, even if I clean them up :nononno:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NS Prospector review
PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 7:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:38 pm
Posts: 394
Location: Eugene and Coos Bay, Oregon.
How does the weight of the Prospector compare to other splits?

It has about the same amount of taper as my Khyber. The Khyber is mostly a power board but I do not like it on steeper firm snow (or really firm snow at all). It is sounding like the Prospector has a lot more backbone to it and the taper might be great for quicker handling and added versatility?

Has anyone ridden it on steeper firm snow enough to say how the tapered tail handles when finishing a turn and locking back onto the slope with the edge?

Sounds like a promising board.

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NS Prospector review
PostPosted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:05 am
Posts: 1522
Location: Colorado
buell: only really been in soft snow so far. Weight is about average for this type of board, I believe Mark (karkis) published it further back. My 167X is about 10 ozs lighter than the (relatively heavy) Venture Storm 166x26 (older model, the current ones are little lighter).
I am not sure that taper will always reduce tail hold on firm steeps, as you know how the sidecut, taper, flex, and rocker/camber profile all interact will influence this. I was surprised how much tail hold my Storm has when needed, considering the rocker and taper. Of course, the Prospector has more taper at 2 cm
On the other hand, the Prospector feels more like a traditional camber board to me (than the Storm, and way more locked in than the furberg), I assume this is due to the nose and tail camber loading up the front and rear contact points. The taper does make it easy to exit turns early, or to push the tail around in tight spots when needed. I will be curious to see how this board does handle in spring steeps...

_________________
Never Summer Prospector 167X, furberg 173 DIY, Dynafit TLT5/6 Mountain , Phantom Bindings, BD Glidelite Skins
Quiver Killer inserts

http://protectourwinters.org/
http://14ersnowboardproject.homestead.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NS Prospector review
PostPosted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 6:27 pm
Posts: 1451
Location: Denver
I found the 161 to be great for spring chuting. I think you'll be pleased with the 167.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  





Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group