Splitboard.com Forums

The World's first exclusive splitboard discussion forums






It is currently Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:01 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Posts: 4952
Location: California
One of the testers from the recent Backcountry and Outside mag gear test had this to say about the Karakoram splitboard bindings....

"The previous day he’d tried out the new Karakoram bindings and had to deal with a lot of issues in the field – they were deemed unreliable from that point on."

http://adamisstoked.com/2012/03/07/spli ... -outside/#

Ouch.

Splitboard.com still hasn't been sent a set of the Karakoram bindings to review (after numerous requests) so I can't speak to it firsthand but I gotta think that the testers were either inexperienced with the bindings (and possibly splitting in general) or doing something wrong. The world may never know. :)

Looking at the pics, I see a couple other hints that some of the testers were probably just new to splitting.....2 section poles (really?) and lifting the ski instead of gliding....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 2:12 pm
Posts: 144
If they're going to slam a product like that they should spell out the issues they had otherwise the article is worthless

_________________
It is obvious that we can no more explain a passion to a person who has never experienced it than we can explain light to the blind. T.S.Eliot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 870
Am I allowed to get on a soapbox without getting thrown into the outtabounds? I guess I'll find out. This has been my biggest pet peeve since splitboarding blew up what about 3 years ago. Companies like K2 got in the game (finally) and rather than going to people with knowledge they put a guy with little to no split experience in charge of there splitboards, the result-poop. This is just one example. JONES, most the guys on the JONES team ride resorts, helicopters, snowmobiles. They hopped on this trend over the weekend just like most the others yet everyone immediately qualifies them as the "know all" of splitboards, the result-poop. Voile, same thing, sure they have some new boards coming out but whos testing them? whos providing feedback (Besides Bob, cause while I love Bob, why would you have the guy who talks the most shit on snowboarders be your snowboard tester), I brought this to Voile the result-poop/deaf ears. Karakorem- no different they need guys yo-yoing the shit out of there gear not resort riders or pros who get new gear every few months and only use it when there not riding lifts. After spending 375+ dollars on the Spark boots I personally find Spark to be unreliable based on how they missed the mark on so many obvious things any experienced splitter could have provided feedback on but instead went to the "pro scene for testing, the result- poop. Companies need to get a clue progress happens from the bottom not the top. Just a shame in my opinion. Yes I know soapbox and maybe doesn't even relate to the original post but understand I have these same high expectations for myself for what I do professionally and I personally feel that this late in the game companies could be doing a better job. And for heaven sakes find some experienced splitter to do your reviews. If they ride resort more than 20% of the time....RED FLAG not your guys/gals. If they've been splitting less than 5 years...find someone else.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:29 pm
Posts: 135
Location: Bend, OR
Cue BGnight..........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:09 pm
Posts: 27
I would love to know what these issues were, its kinda weak mentioning this in a review, and not explaining what and why...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:40 pm
Posts: 738
Location: Seattle
UTAH wrote:
If they ride resort more than 20% of the time....RED FLAG not your guys/gals.


While I get your general statement I would't agree with this part. There are lots of very experienced splitters who ride the resort a fair amount. I probably ride resort 50% of the time, maybe a little less, but would consider myself a very experienced splitboarder and have been splitting for about 15years. So that alone isn't a qualifier. But, yes in testing any new product, they should have experienced people testing it. Especially when its new technology. Sone specifics on why they didn't like them would also be helpful. What kind of issues? Lots of other things can attribute to gear not working properly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:35 pm
Posts: 109
UTAH wrote:
Companies need to get a clue progress happens from the bottom not the top.


I would like to humbly throw my hat in the ring to be the official gear tester for all splitboard manufacturers and reviews. Here is why I feel that I am the best candidate for this prestigious position:

1. I'm a vert whore. Good luck finding someone else to put in 10k days when the snow sucks. That's right, I'll yo-yo a breakable crust long after the "pros" have gone home crying.
2. I'm huge. Nothing says durability like letting the 6'4, 210lb guys exert some force on your gear for a season. If it lasts... your stuff ain't poop.
3. I have bad form. Not only am I heavy, but fairly uncooridinated as well. I'll flex your gear in ways you never imagined.
4. I run over stuff. Rocks and small trees fear me. While all the "pros" are scoping out the perfect line, I've already uncovered every possible obstacle between the peak and the car.
5. I hate gear maintenance. I'd much rather push harder on something than actually adjust it. You won't even need installation instructions for your gear if it lasts a season with me.

I feel these reasons and others too numerous to mention make me an obvious choice to fill the role as official gear tester and finally put an end to the poop-making we've seen from manufacturers recently.

All it takes to make this dream real is for a manufacturer to step up and replace the 100k+/year income required to maintain my current standard of living... and buy me a bunch of protein bars.

Together, we can make a difference. We can stop the poop.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:06 pm
Posts: 167
Location: Mt Shasta
Utah wrote: "Companies like K2 got in the game (finally) and rather than going to people with knowledge they put a guy with little to no split experience in charge of there splitboards, the result-poop."

I really didn't pay much attention to the K2 product because I'd always regarded them as a Ski Co.

Last night at the Weed brewery we saw a slide show and video all narrated by Kyle Miller. He is sponsored by K2 and said he is working with them on product development. He struck me as knowing his shit and puts it to the test (to say the least) based on the gnar I saw.

Sorry for the slightly off topic comment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:18 am
Posts: 303
From the same magazine that named the light rail as the editors choice in 2011? justa worthless opinion/marketing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Posts: 4952
Location: California
I agree with your post Utah and think it's on topic.

UTAH wrote:
If they've been splitting less than 5 years...find someone else.


+1 and not a bad rule of thumb.

As a side note, I'll take this opportunity to give props to Never Summer, Arbor, Chimera, and Spark for getting some product in splitboard.com's hands (and feet) to test this year. :thumbsup:

Wasatch Don, yer funny. Since we're throwing bids out there I'll do it for 2 grand less. :)

ps. In the tester's defense, they have to be sorta vague as all the nitty gritty can't be spelled out until the mag edition.

The other issue I have with the Backcountry and Outside mag test is that it appears that the majority of their tester input is gathered over just a couple days, in one state. To have a truly objective review the process has to be done over a couple months (at the least) in a multitude of states and conditions (in my opinion). You'd think they'd reach out to splitboard.com and our members...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:57 am
Posts: 152
Location: Canada
Wasatch_Don wrote:
Here is why I feel that I am the best candidate for this prestigious position:

1. I'm a vert whore.
2. I'm huge.
3. I have bad form.
4. I run over stuff.
5. I hate gear maintenance.

I feel these reasons and others too numerous to mention make me an obvious choice to fill the role as official gear tester and finally put an end to the poop-making we've seen from manufacturers recently.


LOL excelllent


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 4:09 pm
Posts: 137
UTAH wrote:
Voile, same thing, sure they have some new boards coming out but whos testing them? whos providing feedback (Besides Bob, cause while I love Bob, why would you have the guy who talks the most shit on snowboarders be your snowboard tester), I brought this to Voile the result-poop/deaf ears.


I try skis, snoboards and bindings, when they fit. Been doing that over 25 years.
They get almost immediate feedback and it ain't all positive.
Wondering about the most shit talked? :scratch:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backcountry/Outside Mag testers deem K bindings unreliable?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:51 am
Posts: 636
Karakorum and sparks both have very experienced riders testing their gear. You don't have to spend every day in the bc to know what works. Fact is, we aren't to the point where this stuff is just plug and play. Bindings are tricky, adjustability is tricky. From what I've seen they both work great after some tweakage.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: snowsnowsnow and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  





Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group