Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 6:09 pm Posts: 388 Location: Chamonix, France
I'm like 6' and actually the compacts were too short for me, because I like to use them pretty angled.
Make sure to try em out at the store if you're not sure, i use the standard size at almost full length most of the time, especially in snow but also for hiking.
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:45 am Posts: 749 Location: Bozeman, MT
RIM climber wrote:
Thanks! On order, I went with the compact ones. I am 5'8'' so should be no issue.
Well I didn't have time to chime in for you, RIM climber but perhaps anyone else reading this in the future might care that I too use a set of Black Diamond Poles. I have the Alpine CFs. They employ the bomber Flicklock system and are of reasonable weight for a collapsible pole system.
While I agree that the Flicklock poles from BD are definitely a must (or the similar adjustment system now available from Komperdell (sp?)) I will interject the following. If you are looking for some poles that you plan to use in extremely cold environments I would definitely opt for the BD Trail poles over the BD Expedition poles (I do own both). The hard plastic grips of the Expedition poles seems to stay much colder than the foam grips of the Trail poles. This may not be a big deal on a day trip in nice weather, but if you really plan some touring trips in cold weather it will become less-than-ideal. The hard plastic grip of the Whippet is also my only gripe about that BD product, but it is still far superior to the alternative Grivel Condor IMHO. I'm done
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:57 pm Posts: 4985 Location: California
Interesting point Chris. While I haven't used the Expedition poles in Alaska cold, I have used them in single digit temps and I can't remember the grip temperature being an issue. Maybe I didn't notice because I was too busy trying to keep the rest of my body warm.
I do agree the poles on the Trail version are pretty comfy and I like the way they extend lower on the shaft. Does the foam ever absorb moisture? It seems like if they did and then it froze that could be an issue. I also seem to remember some durability issues with the Trail versions, or maybe it was the CFs.
I heard Petzl had a flick lock style coming out too, maybe they meant Komerdell, or maybe both brands are doing something similar.
Does the foam ever absorb moisture? It seems like if they did and then it froze that could be an issue. I also seem to remember some durability issues with the Trail versions, or maybe it was the CFs.
Water absorption hasn't been a problem to date, even in the summer with sweaty palms they stay dry. Haven't noticed any durability issues on the Trail poles, this will be their third season, and although cosmetically trashed they are still in good functional shape. If I remember right the CF only have only flicklock and one 'button lock'? I personally don't like having only one flicklock as the poles are somewhat limited in terms of how short one can make them.
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:45 am Posts: 749 Location: Bozeman, MT
bcrider wrote:
...Does the foam ever absorb moisture?...
The handles are made of a closed-cell foam which will not absorb water. In fact the miniscule dimples in the outer edge of the foam will keep moisture away from your glove/hand and actually feel less damp than a smooth plastic surface which will keep moisture in direct contact with your person.
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:00 pm Posts: 291 Location: Sacramento, CA
Petzl offers 3-section poles with FLICKLOCKS... http://en.petzl.com/petzl/SportProduits?Produit=89 They come in 3 flavors... aluminum, titanal aluminum or carbon. I've seen these in person and they definately rival the BD poles. They are very simular to BD's Trail and Alpine poles.
_________________ Do or do not. There is no try. - Yoda Using the good stuff!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum