Forums Bindings Union Expedition
Viewing 6 posts - 21 through 26 (of 26 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #812808
    Scooby2
    537 Posts

    ahh, when you are sponsored to promote a companies products you are bound by contract to support whatever they brew up, be it an energy drink or whatever. He is not a splitboard purist by any means. I thought he was very diplomatic in his description of where they fall in the market in that they weren’t the most tech for climbing but they are more affordable (or they will be in a few months 😉 ) and will feel familiar to what the legions of basic resort riders are used to.

    #812833
    downthemtn
    15 Posts

    The Fourth Phase was a fantastic surf movie.

    #812914
    Taylor
    755 Posts

    This is all very funny.

    When Mike at Mountain Weekly News comes dangerously close to actually saying that a product that he tested sucks, you know that Travis Rice is slinging turds.

    @sun_rocket

    #812953
    permnation
    252 Posts

    When Mike at Mountain Weekly News comes dangerously close to actually saying that a product that he tested sucks, you know that Travis Rice is slinging turds.

    QFT. You are right on.

    #813005
    Cbalke
    235 Posts

    Last Friday I ran into two guys who were both riding the Union Expeditions. While the carbon pair appeared to have slightly less wobble in ride mode than the non carbon pair, they both had the same problem. The rider, who has been splitboarding for a number of years explained that he preferred the feel and flex of these over his previous splitboard specific bindings. At the end of the day he mentioned that he did not feel the movement while riding (It should be noted that it was a powder day.)

    #813957
    Shawn Taylor
    2 Posts

    Who splits on a non-powder day?

    I have these bindings, and so far so good for me. Such an improvement in ride mode.

Viewing 6 posts - 21 through 26 (of 26 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.