Forums Splitboards Furberrg Freeride Split vs Solution stiffness
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #800669
    JMAutio
    58 Posts

    How do Furberg Freeride Split and a Jones Solution compare in stiffness?

    #800704
    JMAutio
    58 Posts

    Can someone compare width under foot? It’s quite difficult to guess from numbers, becouse the furberg is wide in the middle due to the big turning radius it has.

    My shoes are 26.5 (TLT6), I think I’d have to go maybe with a 160 furberg, just because of that..?

    #800705
    JMAutio
    58 Posts

    I’m 72kg, so still within the weight for a 160..

    #800709
    permnation
    303 Posts

    Middle of the pack underfoot measures 273mm front and 269mm rear on a 2015 160 Freeride Split. Specs are same for 2017 except camber is less now. That first year of the new design had a ton of camber. I rode the 160 and weighed 80kg, but my size 11’s were pushing the limits. In past threads, i described it as a little missile.

    Let me know if you want any other measurements.

    #800725
    JMAutio
    58 Posts

    Thanks! I´m in the Philippines surfing atm, so can´t measure my boots or my solution 🙂 Do you maybe have underfoot width for a solution also..?

    So you´d describe it as stiff?

    #800735
    JMAutio
    58 Posts

    Well, I went with the 164.. 🙂

    #800737
    permnation
    303 Posts

    The 2015 model year was a little stiff and a lot of camber. Furberg fixed that last year. I think you’ll be happy with your purchase.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.