Forums Splitboards Furberrg Freeride Split vs Solution stiffness Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total) Author Posts February 24, 2017 at 10:56 pm #800669 JMAutio 58 Posts How do Furberg Freeride Split and a Jones Solution compare in stiffness? February 25, 2017 at 5:13 pm #800704 JMAutio 58 Posts Can someone compare width under foot? It’s quite difficult to guess from numbers, becouse the furberg is wide in the middle due to the big turning radius it has. My shoes are 26.5 (TLT6), I think I’d have to go maybe with a 160 furberg, just because of that..? February 25, 2017 at 5:15 pm #800705 JMAutio 58 Posts I’m 72kg, so still within the weight for a 160.. February 25, 2017 at 6:08 pm #800709 permnation 303 Posts Middle of the pack underfoot measures 273mm front and 269mm rear on a 2015 160 Freeride Split. Specs are same for 2017 except camber is less now. That first year of the new design had a ton of camber. I rode the 160 and weighed 80kg, but my size 11’s were pushing the limits. In past threads, i described it as a little missile. Let me know if you want any other measurements. February 26, 2017 at 2:55 am #800725 JMAutio 58 Posts Thanks! I´m in the Philippines surfing atm, so can´t measure my boots or my solution 🙂 Do you maybe have underfoot width for a solution also..? So you´d describe it as stiff? February 26, 2017 at 8:19 am #800735 JMAutio 58 Posts Well, I went with the 164.. 🙂 February 26, 2017 at 8:45 am #800737 permnation 303 Posts The 2015 model year was a little stiff and a lot of camber. Furberg fixed that last year. I think you’ll be happy with your purchase. Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total) You must be logged in to reply to this topic.